I.C.H.C. office | Station Approach | Comberton Hill | Kidderminster | Worcs.|  DY10 1QX
Independent Community & Health Concern Caring for the Community in Wyre Forest
Coronavirus Wash your hands more often
Find out more at nhs.uk/coronavirus
Coronavirus is a serious illness that can make you very ill. The best way to not catch it is to wash your hands more often for 20 seconds. Use soap and water or a hand sanitiser when you: Get home or into work Blow your nose, sneeze or cough Eat or touch food PROTECT YOURSELF & OTHERS
Neil Morris Ferguson OBE FMedSci
Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College (or “professor lock-down” as he is now known) has had the code he used to form the basis of “the Boris science” described as “deeply riddled” with bugs, “a fairly arbitrary Heath Robinson machine”, with “huge blocks of ‘bad practice code’ “.. quite possibly the worst production code I have ever seen”. Not only that, but the model’s software is a 13-year-old, 15,000-line program that simulates homes, offices, schools, people and movements which, according to a team at Edinburgh University which ran the model, gives different outputs (results) if it is run on different machines, and even if it is run on the same machine using different numbers of central-processing units. Worse, the code does not allow for large variations among groups of people with respect to their susceptibility to the virus and their social connections. Still, such disparities will come as nothing new to “professor lockdown” .. his previous ‘guesstimates’ include .. the culling of 6 million livestock (2001) – which was criticised by epidemiological experts as “severely flawed” the prediction of up to 136,000 deaths from mad cow disease 200 million deaths from bird flu 65,000 deaths from swine flu. The final death toll in each case was in the hundreds. Swedish experience of the modified model that Imperial put into the public domain predicted 40,000 deaths by May 1. Just 15 times too high. The proper use of models is to test theories of complex systems against facts. The use of models for forecasting and policy requires that they are accurate. People are losing confidence with the Imperial College model. At the time of the lockdown, the model had not been released to the scientific community; then, when Ferguson finally released his code - last week - it was a reorganised program - quite different from the version he used on March 16th. So .. changed methodologies, no peer review, hardly any disclosure .. hardly ‘science’ .. more “Weird Science” Almost two centuries ago Thomas Huxley described the “great tragedy of science is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.” Have we based one of the biggest peacetime policy decisions on crude mathematical guesswork? With thanks to Matt Ridley .. 'How Innovation Works' (published in June) & David Davis MP (Con) ____________________________________________________________________________

Statistics can also be casualties

The UK virus ‘casualty’ figures (now) include deaths outside of hospital – which makes the UK appear to be worse-performing than other European countries – and which some biased politicians are exaggerating the importance of. Italy. “Because Lombardy’s intensive care units were already filling up within days of Italy’s first cases, many primary care physicians tried to treat and monitor patients at home, putting patients on supplemental oxygen (commonly used for home cases in Italy) but which strategy proved deadly. These home deaths are unrecorded in the nationally published figures.” [Associated Press] Spain 57 per cent of the country’s Covid-19 death toll is care-home-related [Spanish government report] and, once again, such figures are not published alongside the hospital statistics. Data reveals that the majority of Spain's death tolls came in their care-homes and, like Italy, investigations are being launched into their “care-homes massacre” (their description). Last month, a leaked estimate was considered so devastating that the public prosecutor in Milan is now formally investigating what the WHO has described as a care-homes ‘massacre’. The Milan prosecutor regards official mortality totals as representing “.. a staggering underestimate of the true death toll.” So when “politicians” (and certain “newspaper reporters”) pontificate about the situation in British care homes, be sure that we are comparing like statistics with like. ___________________________________________________________________________

“Weird Science” ?


Where’s our ‘R’ ?

Sir Patrick held a virtual briefing with journalists on Friday, (05/06/2020), during which he confirmed the rate was between 0.7 and 1 for England - and 0.9 for the Midlands. It remains between 0.7 and 0.9 for the UK as a whole. He said the prevalence of Covid-19 was on a "downward trajectory" in the UK, adding: "The prevalence of coronavirus, according to the ONS, is at 0.1%, with 53,000 people with Covid-19 in the past two weeks.

“I’m Gonna Sit Right Down .. And Write Myself A Letter ..

A notice, initially attributed as coming from Dr. Nikki Burger, clinical director at Worcester City Primary Care Network and dated June 18, then circulated on social media last weekend (20-21/06), was ‘WRONG’. Alerting us to six positive CoViD cases within one 24 hr period, this message would have placed the city on red alert for a coronavirus outbreak. The notice also exhorted us to: “Please pass this to your GPs and teams urgently.” Herefordshire and Worcestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (showing their remarkable ability to dance on the head of pins) now say that THE NOTICE (do notice that .. “THE NOTICE”) was not produced by Dr. Nikki Burger – but was based on HER E.MAIL which SHE HAD SENT to GP surgeries across Worcester City. Apparently, Dr. Burger had based what she had written on ‘inaccurate’ information. And from where had this ‘inaccurate’ information come ? Well, allegedly, it had originated in an internal briefing sent by the CCG itself to Dr. Berger. What a relief to know that it had come from such an august and responsible body. A spokesperson for Herefordshire and Worcestershire CCG was most insistent: “The letter/poster was not produced or distributed by Dr. Nikki Burger and appears to be based on an actual email .. (wow, an “actual” e.mail .. “..and not just any sort of e.mail, maybe an M&S e.mail ?” .. but might it not have been one of Chump’s “Fake News” e.mails ?) sent by Dr. Nikki Burger to GP surgeries across Worcester City and based on information later found to be incorrect” (like so much of the ‘science’ in this Pandemic). They then went on to surpass themselves with the statement .. “We regret that this information has been misinterpreted and subsequently shared outside of the organisation.” So _ and let’s get the time-scale right _ because, according to them _ the ’inaccurate information’ originated from within the organisation (ie the H&W CCG itself) these ‘inaccuracies’ (and misinterpretations ?) then left the organisation and entered “into the public domain” .. where it was then ‘shared’ (by person or persons unknown) and (with the virtues of hindsight) mis-interpretations drawn .. before being recognised as “wrong” and “inaccurate” (by the people from whence it came). Was it therefore OK to share INACCURATE information internally ? .. Just so long as it didn’t ‘escape’ from the CCG and so “expose” their knowledge about “the knowledge” to the general public. _______________________________________________________